Some people believe discarding iron items e.g. screws in the soil "make is rich in iron, for the good of the plants". This is in the context of the dark soil in northern Bulgaria. Safety concerns aside, is there any truth in this folk saying?

  • I suspect that the unintended side effect of depositing some zinc plating into the soil may be the only possible benefit.
    – jwdonahue
    Jun 5, 2021 at 20:44
  • I think putting screws and nails into the soil is a great way to get puncture wounds while gardening, which can lead to infection and, in rare cases, tetanus. For that reason alone this isn't a good idea, IMO.
    – Jurp
    Jun 6, 2021 at 3:14

3 Answers 3


This adding nails or screws to soil to increase iron content is a myth because any iron that's given out is in a form that's inaccessible to plants, see here https://laidbackgardener.blog/2018/09/08/the-rusty-nail-myth-2/

Add to that the fact that many modern nails and screws are not iron anyway,and it's even more pointless. Iron in a chelated form can be useful to plants, if there is a shortage in the soil, though iron shortage is not that common.

  • What do you mean, that modern nails and screws are not iron? There is usually a small coating of zinc, but the rest is largely iron.
    – IronEagle
    Jun 5, 2021 at 21:26
  • Most modern ordinary nails are steel or stainless steel these days, not just iron. Doesn't matter either way, neither is useful to plants when placed in soil
    – Bamboo
    Jun 5, 2021 at 23:17
  • 1
    Steel is about 99% iron, and rusts at around the same rate. Didn't think about stainless steel, which does have high levels of nickel and chromium and true, really won't rust or supply iron in the same way. Stainless steel is probably more likely to be harmful in that respect, rather than beneficial.
    – IronEagle
    Jun 6, 2021 at 2:06

The premise of Bamboo's link is that iron needs to be soluble to be available to plants. I'm not sure how true that is, but it's a thought I've heard expressed a number of times, a number of places, without any real evidence. I would concur that water soluble minerals generally seem to be more available, however. Bamboo does know a lot about plants, and is highly educated, however; so, I wouldn't take her source lightly.

Even if it's not available to plants at all, the oxide from the iron could potentially get displaced by something else (and may more likely do so in an acidic soil).

Iron oxide nanoparticles are apparently usable by plants, although I'm not sure it's wise to give them to them.

The following link lets us know that iron-absorption isn't well-understood (so, I'm guessing the true answer to your question is unknown, and requires further study to determine): https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335438161_Iron_oxide-humic_acid_coprecipitates_as_iron_source_for_cucumber_plants

However, in the researchgate link above, it does mention how plants used iron from a couple substances that contain related compounds to iron oxide.

I guess the way to figure it out is to get some iron nails, a soil devoid of iron, and transplant something into it. See if it gets iron-deficiency, and compare to a control in the same iron-deficient soil without iron nails. Of course, you'd want a thorough soil test on the soil, and make sure that the exact same soil can be replicated.

I wonder if humic acid (from compost) reacts with iron oxide, and if soil bacteria do stuff to it.

Plant roots can produce malic acid, citric acid, malonic acid (as well as possibly succinic, tartaric, piscidic, aconitic and fumaric acids; which acids they produce probably depends on the plant species and other factors) and can be part of the process in producing carbonic acid. So, if any of those acids react with iron oxide (and I'm not sure that any of them do), then plants might be able to use it, somewhat.

Apparently, soils can contain sugars, too, which means additional acids might be present in the soil. For instance, I hypothesize that some sugars might be converted into alcohols. I know that alcohol can be converted into acetic acid by acetic acid bacteria. I believe acetic acid has some kind of reaction with iron oxide, but I don't know what that reaction is, exactly. I'm sure there are loads of other possible acids and reactions.


I don't know if it makes sense in your situation, but iron is an essential element for plants. The chloroplasts in the leaves need iron for example for cytochrome, an important component in the photosynthesis process.

However, like with all compounds, too much of iron can become toxic. In soil more factors are involved which will make iron available or not (think of e.g., pH and organic matter content, and many more factors). Iron in rust is Fe3+, but plants want to uptake Fe2+. In soil this redox reaction can occur with lower pH, see here a scientific paper about Iron in soil.

For your situation in Bulgaria, I don't know. I don't know if your soil is deficient of iron, or not. Do you have iron measurements from your soil? Also do you have other properties (pH, organic matter content) of your soil available?

  • Your link seems to be at the top of google searches but the quoted number is irrelevant. Most iron in soils is fully oxidized (ferric, Fe3+) but plants can only use ferrous (Fe2+) iron which is a micronutrient. Ferrous iron concentration higher than 0.01% can be toxic to plants depending on the soil pH. Also chlorophyll does not contain any iron, though one of the pathways to create chlorophyll uses iron compounds (similar to haemoglobin in blood) as a catalyst.
    – alephzero
    Jun 5, 2021 at 18:24
  • Sorry, typo - "higher than 0.01%" should be "higher than 0.001%".
    – alephzero
    Jun 5, 2021 at 18:36
  • No worries @alephzero. I tried to improve my answer taking your comment into account.
    – benn
    Jun 5, 2021 at 19:35

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.